Legal Opinion

McConnell v. Wolcott

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 1, 1904No. 13,846PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from Rice district court; Ansel R. Clark, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J. :

F. D. Wolcott recovered a judgment on January 20, 1902, against F. M. McConnell and Florence McConnell, his wife, for $2206.50. An execution was issued January 29,1902, which was returned Feb*376ruary 18,1902, wholly unsatisfied for want of property on which to levy. February 18, 1902, the plaintiff instituted supplementary proceedings in aid of execution by filing an affidavit that the defendants had property which they unjustly refused to apply toward the satisfaction of the judgment, and an order was-issued commanding them to appear before…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Edmonston v. . McLoudNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Jacoby v. Parkland Distilling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Van Alstyne v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  4. Long v. MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  5. Becker v. . TorranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1864

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. First American Title Insurance v. Lett (In Re Lett)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1999
  2. In Re MuellerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1987
  3. Douglas County Bank v. Fine (In Re Fine)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1988
  4. Compton v. Herrman (In Re Herrman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2006
  5. Jenkins v. HodesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API