Legal Opinion

State v. Lindley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 17, 1986No. 8515SC1372PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of two motions, (1) a motion to quash the indictment and (2) a motion made at the close of all the evidence to dismiss the charge of felonious breaking and entering. The issue dispositive of both of defendant’s assignments of error is whether an unconsented to entry of premises, which is expressly prohibited by a marital separation agreement and the taking and carrying away of antique guns valued at over $4,500.00 is sufficient to indict for and submit charges to the jury of felonious breaking and entering and felonious…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. EasterlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. FultonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. State v. . FultonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MahaleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API