Legal Opinion

State v. . Fulton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1908PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Before pleading, the defendant, through his attorneys, moved to quash the bill of indictment for the reason that no offense was charged, it not being criminal offense for a husband to slander his wife. His Honor sustained the motion, quashed the bill of indictment, and the State appealed. It is admitted by the learned counsel for the State that this Court has long since decided that a husband is not indictable for slandering his wife under our statute, S. v. Edens, 95 N.C. 693, and we are asked to overrule that decision.

It was in 1886 that the eminent jurists who occupied this bench at that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Attorney General v. Utica InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  2. White v. . WagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  3. Fox v. . StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. State v. . EdensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. State v. . HaddockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bulova Watch Co. v. Brand Distributors of North Wilkesboro, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Virmani v. Presbyterian Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. State v. MahaleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. LindleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API