Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 2018No. COA17-661PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

*286 Where the notice prohibiting defendant's entry in all Belk Stores was made in the ordinary course of business at or near the time of the transaction involved and was authenticated at trial by a witness familiar with such notices and the system under which they are made, the document was properly authenticated and the trial court did not err in admitting it. Where the general license or privilege to enter a store open to the public was specifically revoked as to defendant, and his ban from the store was implemented and "personally communicated" to him and no evidence suggests it…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. FritschSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. SpringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DeJesusCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  2. State of Tennessee v. William C. SuttonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2025
  3. State v. ClemonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  4. State v. DavenportCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API