Legal Opinion
Moss v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 28, 1945No. 326PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff, a citizen of Pennsylvania, was injured in a railway accident in North Carolina, while a passenger on the defendant’s train. The defendant is-a Virginia corporation, having its principal place of business in North Carolina, but also maintaining a place of business in the City of New York. It has never filed any consent to be sued in New York, but we will assume for argument that it does enough business in New York to require it to file the consent required by § 210(1) of the General Corporation Law of that state,, Consol.Laws, c. 23 — a consent which subjects it to service upon…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- In Re Keasbey & Mattison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. ChattersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Bagdon v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
3Cited by25 opinions
- Johnson Creative Arts, Inc. v. Wool Masters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Remington Rand, Inc. v. Knapp-Monarch CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- McCoy v. SilerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Knott Corporation v. FurmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Moss v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.