Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Tynerial Ray Kindred

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 6, 2013No. 2 CA-CR 2012-0479PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Judge.

¶ 1 Tynerial Kindred appeals from his second-degree burglary conviction, arguing the evidence was insufficient to support his con viction because he did not gain entry into the structure and there was no evidence he intended to commit theft or a felony within. We affirm.

¶ 2 “We construe the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” State v. Greene, 192 Ariz. 431, ¶ 12, 967 P.2d 106, 111-12 (1998). In June 2012, an apartment complex leasing agent called 9-1-1 after seeing Kindred…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. WestArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. GreeneArizona Supreme Court · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. David BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. State v. DeckerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. State v. HoltNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. MERLINO (CARRIE) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2015
  5. MERLINO (CARRIE) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API