State of Arizona v. Tynerial Ray Kindred
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, Judge.
¶ 1 Tynerial Kindred appeals from his second-degree burglary conviction, arguing the evidence was insufficient to support his con viction because he did not gain entry into the structure and there was no evidence he intended to commit theft or a felony within. We affirm.
¶ 2 “We construe the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” State v. Greene, 192 Ariz. 431, ¶ 12, 967 P.2d 106, 111-12 (1998). In June 2012, an apartment complex leasing agent called 9-1-1 after seeing Kindred…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. WestArizona Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GreeneArizona Supreme Court · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. David BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- State v. DeckerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- State v. HoltNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- MERLINO (CARRIE) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2015
- MERLINO (CARRIE) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.