Legal Opinion

State v. Decker

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 7, 2016No. 1 CA-CR 14-0238PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CATTANI, Judge:

¶ 1 In this case we address whether firing a bullet into a residence constitutes “entry” for purposes of establishing first-degree burglary. Given Arizona’s expansive statutory definition of entry, and in light of the property, possessory, and privacy interests that the offense of burglary is intended to protect, we conclude that a projectile intruding into a protected space satisfies the entry requirement for burglary. We further address and reject a claim regarding the superior court’s denial of Batson 1 challenges to the State’s peremptory strikes of two potential…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. State v. NewellArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. RoqueArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Ex Parte HydeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. David BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. State v. CeasarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. Cameron (Wayne) v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Decker v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  5. State v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API