Legal Opinion
Poser v. Abel
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 4, 1994No. C4-93-938PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
On appeal from a judgment for respondent, Ronald Poser, appellants Robert Abel and Peter Bugbee claim the trial court erred in finding Poser was entitled to a commission on the sale of their building when the writing describing the commission arrangement did not comply with the written agreement requirement in Minn.Stat. § 82.33, subd. 2 (1988). We affirm because the written commission document, when read with another document executed at the same time, satisfied the written agreement requirement in Minn.Stat. § 82.33, subd. 2.
FACTS
Respondent Ronald Poser, a real estate…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Anderson v. KammeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Citizens State Bank of Hayfield v. LethCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Taylor v. MoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Doyle v. WohlrabeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Taylor Investment Corp. v. WeilDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
- S O Designs USA, Inc. v. Rollerblade, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Donald G. Cousineau v. Norstan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Paisley Park Enterprises, Inc. v. BoxillDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Cityscapes Development, LLC v. Larry SchefflerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.