Legal Opinion

Lucus v. Cowan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 20, 1960No. 38899PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALLEY, Justice.

The parties before us occupy the same relative positions as they did below. They will be given their trial court designations.

Plaintiffs instituted this action in October, 1958, to quiet their title to an undivided one-fourth interest in minerals underlying a certain quarter section of land situated in Kingfisher County. Like relief was sought by the defendants who filed a cross-petition. The issues were submitted on stipulation of facts. Judgment was rendered in favor of defendants on their cross-petition. Plaintiffs seek corrective relief from this Court.

The facts, so far as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Colby v. StevensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Hanlon v. McLainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Equitable Royalty Corp. v. HulletSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Triangle Royalty Corp. v. GravesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Bliss v. Wilcox Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Buckhorn Ranch PartnershipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. United Oklahoma Bank v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. Wood v. SympsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Singer-Fleischaker Royalty Co. v. WhisenhuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. Campbell v. ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API