Legal Opinion

United Oklahoma Bank v. Moss

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 30, 1990No. 70129, 71364PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Vice Chief Justice.

The husband-debtor’s ex-wife tenders two issues for our decision in this appeal: (1) Does the husband’s mortgage of non-homestead property they owned together, given without the wife’s knowledge or consent, have priority over the lien impressed in her favor by the divorce decree? and (2) Did the foreclosure sale comply with Oklahoma law? We answer the first question in the affirmative insofar as it applies to the husband’s prior (pre-mortgage) interest in the property and in the negative insofar as it affects the wife’s prior (pre-divorce) interest in the premises.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gelfert v. National City Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Collins v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  3. Peters v. PetersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. Com'rs of the Land Office v. HarrowerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Harmon v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Founders Bank and Trust Co. v. UpsherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, Chickasha, Oklahoma v. NathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. In Re KrohnArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  4. First Community Bank of Blanchard v. HodgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Board of County Commisioners v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API