Bliss v. Wilcox Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This is an action to quiet title brought by the owners of one-half the minerals in and under described lands in Woods county, Oklahoma, against the fee owners of said lands. Plaintiffs in error were defendants in the trial court, but for convenience we shall refer to them as “grantors”. Defendant in error will be designated as “grantee.”
The factual situation of this case is very similar to that of Hanlon v. McLain, 206 Okla. 227 242 P. 2d 732, except that the question of disclaimer in the foreclosure action is not presented here. Therein we held that where a grantor had given a general…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hanlon v. McLainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Equitable Royalty Corp. v. HulletSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
3Cited by7 opinions
- Colby v. StevensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Lucus v. CowanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Triangle Royalty Corp. v. GravesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Singer-Fleischaker Royalty Co. v. WhisenhuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Born v. BentleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.