Legal Opinion

Spann v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 1, 2007No. A06-1474PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Russell A., Chief Justice.

Appellant Joseph T. Spann appeals from a summary denial of his posteonvietion pe tition arguing that (1) he was sentenced in violation of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004); (2) his convictions for multiple offenses arising out of the same behavioral incident violated Minn.Stat. § 609.04 (2006); and (3) his right to equal protection was violated because the county did not use a racially neutral jury pool selection process. We affirm the postconviction court’s denial of relief with respect to Spann’s conviction…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. State v. PflepsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. State v. LaTourelleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Bobo v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. State v. FardanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. State v. CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  5. Greer v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API