Spann v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Russell A., Chief Justice.
Appellant Joseph T. Spann appeals from a summary denial of his posteonvietion pe tition arguing that (1) he was sentenced in violation of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004); (2) his convictions for multiple offenses arising out of the same behavioral incident violated Minn.Stat. § 609.04 (2006); and (3) his right to equal protection was violated because the county did not use a racially neutral jury pool selection process. We affirm the postconviction court’s denial of relief with respect to Spann’s conviction…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. PflepsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. LaTourelleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bobo v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. FardanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Greer v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.