Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vatchagan PETROSIAN, Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 15, 1997No. 96-50120PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Vatchagan Petrosian appeals his counterfeit trafficking, mail fraud, and conspiracy convictions. We affirm.

I

Petrosian and two associates purchased genuine Coca-Cola bottles, filled them with a cola-like carbonated beverage that was not Coca-Cola, and told purchasers the beverage was Coca-Cola. Petrosian was charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 2320(a), which provides: “Whoever intentionally traffics or attempts to traffic in goods or services and knowingly uses a counterfeit mark on or in connection with such goods or services shall” be criminally hable. Petrosian asserts that the district…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. Pablo MayansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Mike Huang, John Chu, Paul Park, and Kwan Yue CheoiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  4. General Electric Company and Carboloy, Inc. v. Robert Speicher and Speicher, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. TagalicudCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. FregaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Guillermo VallejoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Frank Fiorillo, Jr., and Art KruegerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mika GERGEN, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. HanafyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API