Legal Opinion

City of St. Paul v. Clark

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 29, 1935No. 30,403PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Justice.

The defendant was convicted of violation of an ordinance fixing minimum taxi fares in the city of St. Paul. He comes here contending that the city has neither express nor implied power under its charter to fix minimum rates and that even if it has such powen there is no justification for its exercise of police power in this respect.

The city has, of course, no power to legislate except such as may be given it by the legislature, but if a power may be necessarily or fairly implied from powers expressly granted it will be held that the legislature intended to grant such implied…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Jay Burns Baking Co. v. McKelvieNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Commonwealth v. GageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of St. Paul v. DalsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Sverkerson v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Lyons v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. State v. United Parking Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Parsons v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API