Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Scott & Scott, Inc. v. CITY OF MOUNT. BROOK

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 6, 2002No. 1010524PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On December 16, 1999, the City of Mountain Brook sued Scott Scott, Inc., Walter F. Scott, Jr., Walter F. Scott III, Barbara Ann Scott,1 Sara Heard Allred, Virgil Heard, Crestline Center Partnership,2 1st Allred Income Trust,3 and Jefferson Properties, Ltd.,4 seeking to collect allegedly owed and unpaid business license taxes. We refer to the defendants collectively as "the Scotts." Their brief on appeal, filed formally on behalf of all of the defendants, states: "The individual Scotts are related by blood or marriage and hold the properties in their individual capacities or through…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Barber v. Jefferson County Racing Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Vaughn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  3. Alfa Life Insurance Corp. v. ColzaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  4. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  5. State v. LupoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API