Legal Opinion

State v. Lupo

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 12, 2007No. 1050224PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The State of Alabama, by and through the Alabama State Board of Registration for Interior Design ("the Board"), appeals from a judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court declaring the Alabama Interior Design Consumer Protection Act, Act No. 2001-660, Ala. Acts 2001 ("the Act"), codified at § 34-15B-1 et seq., Ala. Code 1975, unconstitutional. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

On August 28, 2002, the Board sued Diane Burnett Lupo in the Jefferson Circuit Court. The complaint alleged that the Board had found Lupo in violation of the Act for practicing "interior design" without registering with…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shoney's LLC v. MAC EAST, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  2. 1568 Montgomery Highway, Inc. v. City of HooverSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. Locke v. ShoreDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2010
  4. 1568 Montgomery Highway, Inc. v. City of HooverSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  5. Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API