Legal Opinion
Toro Co. v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 26, 1996No. Civil 4-95-656PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion of plaintiff The Toro Company (“Toro”) for a preliminary injunction. Based upon a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated below, the court denies plaintiff’s motion.
BACKGROUND
This case concerns the alleged infringement of United States Patent No. 4,694,528 (the “ ’528 patent”), which describes a hand-held convertible electric vacuum-blower apparatus (“vacuum-blower”) of the type commonly used in yard work to collect leaves and other debris. The patent application was filed on July 18,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Travelers Express Co. v. Transaction Tracking Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
- Agency of Natural Resources v. Francis Supeno, Barbara Supeno, and Barbara ErnstSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Kemin Foods, L.C. v. Pigmentos Vegetales Del Centro S.A. De C.V.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2003
- Giantceutical, Inc. v. Ken Mable, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005