Legal Opinion

Agency of Natural Resources v. Francis Supeno, Barbara Supeno, and Barbara Ernst

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 16, 2018No. 2017-187PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

¶ 1. Respondents, Francis Supeno, Barbara Supeno, and Barbara Ernst, appeal an order of the Environmental Division imposing a penalty of $27,213 for water and wastewater permit violations. On appeal, respondents argue that their due process rights were violated, the penalty assessment was precluded by res judicata, and the amount of the penalty was excessive. We affirm.

¶ 2. The following facts are either not disputed or were found by the court. Respondents Francis Supeno and Barbara Supeno are siblings and jointly own property in Addison at 306 Fisher Point Road. Barbara Supeno and Barbara…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Carmichael v. Adirondack Bottled Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. 37 Collier bankr.cas.2d 1380, Bankr. L. Rep. P 77,400 D & K Properties Crystal Lake, an Illinois Partnership v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. In Re Central Vermont Public Service CorporationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  5. Lamb v. GeovjianSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sharond Hill v. Springfield Hospital and Emergency Services of New England, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2023
  2. In Re Katzenbach A250 Permit 7R1374-1 (Christian Katzenbach & Clark Katzenbach, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2022
  3. Kittredge v. StateVermont Superior Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API