Cummings v. General Motors Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The plaintiff had a verdict in the Superior Court in an action for negligence. The defendants have appealed and have assigned error in the finding, in the charge to the jury, in the denial of their motions to set aside the verdict and to strike certain testimony offered by the plaintiff, and in the granting of the plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint. They have sought extensive corrections in the finding. They have, however, *445abandoned the errors assigned in the charge, and no correction of the finding is warranted or necessary to present adequately the errors assigned in the granting of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dean v. HershowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Antonofsky v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Nolan v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Perry v. HaritosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Salvatore v. HaydenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Connecticut National Bank v. VoogSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- DuBose v. CarabettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Jonap v. SilverConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Beckman v. JALICH HOMES, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.