Legal Opinion

City of Murfreesboro v. Pierce Hardy Real Estate, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 13, 2000No. M2000-00562-COA-R9-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 13, 2000 Session CITY OF MURFREESBORO v. PIERCE HARDY REAL ESTATE, INC. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. 35319 Robert E. Corlew, Judge No. M2000-00562-COA-R9-CV - Filed October 12, 2001 This case involves a dispute between the City of Murfreesboro and a landowner over the value and the acreage of a tract of land taken by the city to be used for a greenway along the Stones River. The city appeals the trial court’s denial of a motion in limine that the city filed to exclude testimony of the landowner’s appraiser. The…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. United States v. RandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Shelby County v. BardenTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Day v. ArmstrongWyoming Supreme Court · 1961

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API