Legal Opinion

United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 28, 1941No. 535PublishedCited by 161 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts

The question for decision is whether the United States must compensate a riparian owner for injury to structures located between high and low water marks, where the damage is caused by the raising of the water level in a navigable stream for the improvement of navigation. The importance of the question, and a conflict in the decisions of this court, led to the grant of certiorari.

The tracks of the respondent railroad and the pole lines of the respondent telegraph company in Wabasha and Winona counties, Minnesota, as relocated in 1910, are, in part, on an embankment on the westerly side of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Gilman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1866

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by161 opinions

  1. City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. Willow River Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Ackerson v. Bean Dredging, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. RandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API