State v. Haig
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ELLETT, Chief Justice:
These five cases are consolidated and the question raised is the constitutionality of *838U.C.A.,1953, 76-10-1201, 1203 which, so far as material, read:
76-10-1201. . . .(1) “Material” means anything printed or written or any picture, drawing, photograph, motion picture, or pictorial representation, or any statue or other figure, or any recording or transcription, or any mechanical, chemical, or electrical reproduction, or anything which is or may be used as a means of communication. Material includes undeveloped photographs, molds, printing plates, and other latent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. PackardUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- Salt Lake City v. PiepenburgUtah Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. PierrenUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- Provo City Corp. v. ThompsonUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- James Piepenburg v. Roger Cutler, City Attorney of Salt Lake City, Utah, and E. D. Hayward, Sheriff of Salt Lake County, UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Community Television of Utah, Inc. v. Roy CityDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1982
- Home Box Office, Inc. v. WilkinsonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.