Legal Opinion

State v. Haig

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1978No. 15286, 15288, 15289, 15290 and 15291PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLETT, Chief Justice:

These five cases are consolidated and the question raised is the constitutionality of *838U.C.A.,1953, 76-10-1201, 1203 which, so far as material, read:

76-10-1201. . . .(1) “Material” means anything printed or written or any picture, drawing, photograph, motion picture, or pictorial representation, or any statue or other figure, or any recording or transcription, or any mechanical, chemical, or electrical reproduction, or anything which is or may be used as a means of communication. Material includes undeveloped photographs, molds, printing plates, and other latent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. PackardUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Salt Lake City v. PiepenburgUtah Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. PierrenUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Provo City Corp. v. ThompsonUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. James Piepenburg v. Roger Cutler, City Attorney of Salt Lake City, Utah, and E. D. Hayward, Sheriff of Salt Lake County, UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  4. Community Television of Utah, Inc. v. Roy CityDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1982
  5. Home Box Office, Inc. v. WilkinsonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API