Legal Opinion

Heath v. Miller

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 8, 1944No. 14756PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

Mrs. M. M. Simmons and Chas. T. Stewart as administrators of the estate of Mrs. Corrie H. Ewing, deceased, are designated in the bill of exceptions, along with other named persons, as plaintiffs in error, and are otherwise therein referred to as parties to the ease; but the record shows that they are not named in the petition either as parties plaintiff or as parties defendant. The only reference made in the petition to these parties is the fact that the lessors, the real plaintiffs in the case, deeded the described property to Mrs. Corrie H.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hobby v. BunchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. Tate v. GoodeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  3. Dugas v. HammondSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Tillman v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  5. McKinney v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Harrell v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Perkins v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  3. Moore v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Parnell v. WootenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  5. Vinson v. CannonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API