Legal Opinion

Newman v. Albert

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 1959No. Civ. 6020PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

This is an action for declaratory relief and for specific performance of a contract for the purchase and sale of real property. The trial court ordered judgment for plaintiffs and ordered that a deed conveying the real property involved be delivered to plaintiffs upon payment to the defendant executor of the sum of $9,000. Defendant Donald Forbes Albert, as executor of the estate of John William Forbes, appeals from the judgment, claiming that the evidence is insufficient to support and sustain the findings.

On May 24, 1946, John W. Forbes, Henning Newman and his wife, Esther Newman, signed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Dillard v. McKnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Williams v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Julian v. GoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Transmix Corp. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. California Milling Corp. v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Doria v. International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Harvey v. BoysenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Hendricks v. SeftonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API