Tequila Centinela, S.A. de C.V. v. Bacardi & Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiffs Motion [46] for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. Upon consideration of the motion, the opposition and reply thereto, the record herein, and the applicable law, the Court concludes that plaintiff is entitled to reasonable costs in the amount of $33,382.16.
I. BACKGROUND
The plaintiff, Tequila Centinela, S.A. de C.V., (“Centinela”), brought this action seeking review and reversal of the March 5, 2003, February 24, 2004, and October 19, 2004 Decisions and Orders of the Trademark Trial and Appeal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- DL v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Beck v. Test Masters Educational Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Covad Communications Company v. Revonet IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Trade Exchange Network Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Woodland v. Viacom Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.