Legal Opinion
Woodland v. Viacom Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 25, 2008No. Civil Action No. 05-1611 (PLF/JMF)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
In a Memorandum Order [# 33] dated March 6, 2008, this Court ordered that plaintiff pay all reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by defendant in filing Defendant Viacom Inc. ’s Motion to Compel Plaintiffs Responses to Defendant’s Discovery Requests (“Def.Mot.”) [# 17]. Order (3/6/08) at 2. I have before me defendant’s Affidavit of John S. Ferrer Itemizing Attorneys’ Fees and Costs Incurred by Defendant (“Affidavit”) [# 34] and plaintiffs Opposition to the Reasonableness of Defendant’s Request for Attorney’s Fees…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- National Ass'n of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Eley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Covad Communications Company v. Revonet IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Trade Exchange Network Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Cobell Ex Rel. Cobell v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Walker v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.