Legal Opinion
Commission on Hospitals & Health Care v. Lakoff
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 27, 1990No. 13812PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the defendants, Kenneth M. Lakoff et al.,1 were required by law to seek permission from the plaintiff, the commis*323sion on hospitals and health care (commission), prior to providing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) services2 at the Cromwell Imaging Center located in the town of Cromwell. The defendants acquired a Technicare 0.6 Teslacon MRI system and began offering MRI services to the public on March 21, 1988. Upon investigation, the commission determined that the defendants’ failure to secure the approval of the commission prior to acquiring the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Rhodes v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. BlaskoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- New England Rehabilitation Hospital of Hartford, Inc. v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Coppola v. CoppolaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Town of Wallingford v. Department of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Miller's Pond Co., LLC v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- American Eyecare v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.