Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Daniels

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 27, 1957No. Civ. 22595PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

The action herein was instituted by the infant plaintiff, “to determine parental relationship,” and was directed against the mother, Joan Evelyn Daniels, and the alleged father, respondent herein. Respondent’s answer denies paternity of the child and alleges that plaintiff was conceived while the mother was the wife of one Jay Schleuter, and that before, during and after the conception of plaintiff, the mother cohabited with the husband who was not impotent; that therefore, under section 1962, subdivision 5, of the Code of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff child is conclusively presumed to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chatham v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Estate of Marshall v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Cinders v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Whitney v. WhitneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Madden v. MaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API