Legal Opinion

LaMontagne v. Kenney

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 26, 1934PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the revocation of a permit issued by the respondents, as mayor and members of the city council of Woburn, pursuant to G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 111, § 151, giving to one Goldsmith written consent and permission to operate a melting and rendering establishment in a building and on premises previously occupied as a tannery. The ground for relief is alleged to be that the license was granted in violation of the zoning laws of Woburn and of the Commonwealth. At the times here material there was in force in Woburn a zoning ordinance, the validity of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Attorney General v. City of MethuenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. Inhabitants of Wakefield v. American Surety Co. of New YorkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  4. Bianchi v. Commissioner of Public BuildingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. August A. Busch & Co. of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  2. Wilbur v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Inspector of Buildings of Burlington v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Town of Billerica v. QuinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Chilson v. Zoning Board of Appeal of AttleboroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API