Legal Opinion

Graham v. Cloar

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 30, 1947PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaptist, J.

The parties will be referred to as in the Circuit Court.

The plaintiff, Margaret Cloar, by next friend, sued the defendants, Union City Coca Cola Bottling Company, a partnership composed of Hardy M. Graham, Cora P. Graham, Zed Hawkins and Daisy P. Hawkins, for damages arising from the alleged explosion of two bottles of coca cola, alleged to have been bottled by the defendants, causing the loss of plaintiff’s eye.

The declaration is in two counts.

The first count alleges, in substance, that the plaintiff while employed in the Kroger Grocery Company of Union City, Tennessee, in the exercise of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coca-Cola Bottling Works v. SullivanTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  2. John Gerber Co. v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Crigger v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Brown v. MarshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Burke v. EllisTennessee Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Defore v. Bourjois, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  2. Messer Griesheim Industries, Inc. v. Cryotech of Kingsport, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  3. Boykin v. Chase Bottling WorksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  4. Latham v. Technar, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1974
  5. Central Truckaway System, Inc. v. WaltnerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API