Legal Opinion

Boykin v. Chase Bottling Works

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 2, 1949PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, P. J.

Mrs. Boykin sustained a personal injury from the bursting of a bottle containing a carbonated beverage produced and sold by the defendant. She brought this action for damages, charging negligence on the part of the defendant in bottling the drink. Her husband brought a separate action for loss of services and companionship and for expenses incurred in treating his wife’s injuries. The cases were tried together. The declarations are respectively in two counts. There were jury verdicts in both cases in favor of the defendant as to count one and directed verdicts as to count two. The judge…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Griffen v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Payne v. Rome Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  5. Stolle v. Anheuser-Busch Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Bornstein v. Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Sullivan v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  3. Underwood v. HCA Health Services of Tennessee, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  4. Roberts v. RayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958
  5. Sociedad de Gananciales v. Presbyterian HospitalSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API