Legal Opinion

Marriage of Carrick v. Carrick

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 1, 1997No. C9-96-1596PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant contests the trial court’s award of temporary spousal maintenance, the award of a nonmarital interest to respondent, the determination that appellant dissipated assets, and the distribution of property. She also requests attorney fees on appeal. Because the trial court erred in finding appellant underemployed in bad faith based on improper consideration of the homemaker’s role, erred in determining respondent’s income, and made insufficient findings on respondent’s expenses, we reverse and remand the issue of spousal maintenance. Because the trial court did not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Marriage of Erlandson v. ErlandsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Marriage of Nardini v. NardiniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Hertz v. HertzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kittredge v. KittredgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. Christianson v. ChristiansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Marriage of Schallinger v. SchallingerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  4. Marriage of Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Marriage of Passolt v. PassoltCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API