Legal Opinion

Christianson v. Christianson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 2003No. 20030123PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Gerald Christianson is appealing a Northwest Judicial District Court judgment awarding Cecelia Christianson $900.00 per month in spousal support. Gerald Christianson argues that the district court erred in imputing income to him when determining his ability to pay, that Cecelia Christianson’s needs as a disadvantaged spouse were not supported by the evidence, that temporary support should have been awarded, and that equalizing their income was inappropriate. Because we are unable to fully review the district court’s finding that Cecelia Christianson is a disadvantaged…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. MahoneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Sommers v. SommersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Sabot v. Fargo Women's Health Organization, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Shields v. ShieldsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wold v. WoldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Klose v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. HilgersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Christian v. ChristianNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Overland v. OverlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API