Legal Opinion

Sposato v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Carmine- Sposato, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Nassau on the 21st day of March, 1902, upon the dismissal- 'of the complaint by direction of the court upon the opening of counsel at a trial at the Nassau Trial Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J.:

This is an action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff as lessee of certain' premises on Long Island, alleged to be injuriously affected by the operation of the •defendant’s pumping stations. It was stipulated upon the opening •of the case that two of the pumping stations complained of were erected in 1885, and that they had been operated since that time, and that the third one was constructed in 1894. The plaintiff leased the premises in 1898, for a term of five years, and alleges that he has sustained damages to the amount of $2,500 by reason Of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kernochan v. . N.Y.E.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Reisert v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. Winthrop v. Manhattan Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baumann v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Fort Lyon Canal Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  3. Strang v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Baumann v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API