Legal Opinion
O'BRYAN v. Holy See
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided January 10, 2007No. Civil Action 3:04CV-338-HPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HEYBURN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs James O’Bryan, Donald Poppe, and Michael Turner (“Plaintiffs”) filed this putative class action against the Holy See (“Defendant”) in its Capacity as a foreign state and in its capacity as an unincorporated association and head of an international religious organization, alleging claims for liability under the doctrines of respondeat superior for acts of bishops and priests, violations of customary international law of human rights, negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, infliction of emotional distress, deceit, and misrepresentation.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Saudi Arabia v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- First National City Bank v. Banco Para El Comercio Exterior De CubaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- O'Bryan v. Holy SeeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Frontera Resources Azerbaijan Corp. v. State Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Doe v. SeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- O'BRYAN v. Holy SeeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Doe v. Holy SeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.