Legal Opinion
O'Bryan v. Holy See
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 10, 2009No. 07-5078, 07-5163UnknownCited by 161 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.
AMENDED OPINION
Defendant Holy See appeals the district court’s denial, in part, of its motion to dismiss all of plaintiffs’ claims due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Holy See contends that the district court has no subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ claims because the Holy See is immune from suit as a foreign state pursuant to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1602 el seq. Plaintiffs James H. O’Bryan, Donald E. Poppe, and Michael J. Turner (“plaintiffs”) cross-appeal the district court’s partial grant of the…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- The Ohio National Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by161 opinions
- Carrier Corporation v. Outokumpu OyjCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Doe v. SeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Swarna v. Al-AwadiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Rote v. Zel Custom Manufacturing LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Global Technology, Inc. v. Yubei (Xinxiang) Power Steering System Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.