Legal Opinion

Doe v. See

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 3, 2009No. 06-35563, 06-35587PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

557 F.3d 1066 (2009)

John V. DOE, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Holy SEE, Defendant-Appellant.

John V. Doe, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Holy See, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 06-35563, 06-35587.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 5, 2008.

Filed March 3, 2009.

Jeffrey S. Lena, Law Office of Jeffrey S. Lena, Berkeley, CA, for the defendant-appellant-cross-appellee.

Marci A. Hamilton, Washington Crossing, PA, for the plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant.

Before: FERDINAND F. FERNANDEZ and MARSHA S. BERZON, Circuit Judges, and OTIS D. WRIGHT, II[*], District Judge.

2Per curiam

We consider whether, on…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

3Cases cited84 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. White v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. Phillip Lunn v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API