Legal Opinion
Arundel Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 2, 1942No. 44622PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge
The plaintiff sues the defendant on twelve different claims, as set out in the findings of fact. These claims will be discussed in order.
CLAIM NO. 1.-ADDITIONAL COST POR CONCRETE PORMS IN DAM ON ACCOUNT OP ALLEGED CHANGES IN CONTRACT DRAWINGS
Plaintiff sues for the cost of the additional concrete forms necessitated by the installation in the dam of chain storage recesses, and recesses for a pick-up device.
The defendant defends first on the ground that plaintiff did not protest at the time it was required to put in the chain storage recesses and the recesses for the pick-up device, as required…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- W. E. Callahan Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
- Thompson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
- Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
3Cited by13 opinions
- Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Olympus Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Fox Valley Engineering Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- Penn-Ohio Steel Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- John McShain, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.