Legal Opinion
Olympus Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 23, 1996No. 96-5002PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Olympus Corporation appeals from the order of the United States Court of Federal Claims, granting the government’s motion for summary judgment in this contract action. Olympus Corp. v. United States, No. 94-51C (Fed.Cl. Sept. 6, 1995). Because the court did not err in determining that Olympus was not entitled to an equitable adjustment under a Differing Site Conditions clause for delays caused by conditions that developed after the contract was executed, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
The parties do not dispute the material facts on this appeal. On March 10, 1987, Olympus entered…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- United States v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Barsebäck Kraft AB v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- JWK International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- United States Ex Rel. K & R Ltd. Partnership v. Massachusetts Housing Finance AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Cube Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Renda Marine, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.