Legal Opinion
Fort Smith Gas Co. v. Blankenship
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 1, 1937No. 4-4543PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
This appeal is from a judgment in favor of Danny Hugh Blankenship, a child five months old, in the sum of $287.50 for damages.
It was alleged in the complaint that F. J. Reichart resided at 1001 south Eleventh street in Fort Smith and that his daughter, Mrs. Retha Blankenship, and her infant child, resided with him at that place.
■ On February 17, 1936, the gas company cut off or disconnected the gas from Reichart’s home about 10:00 o ’clock in the forenoon and did not reconnect or turn on the gas till about 2:00 o’clock in the afternoon. It was a very .cold, raw day with flurries of snow.
That…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HempflingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Turner v. Hot Springs Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Standard Pipe Line Co. v. BurnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Denton v. Mammoth Spring Electric Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Fort Smith Light & Traction Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Glidewell, Admin. v. Arkhola Sand Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Waters v. National Life & Accident Ins.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Coffman v. Southern Coal Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1943
- Heekin Can Co. v. KimbroughDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.