Legal Opinion

Coffman v. Southern Coal Co.

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided November 3, 1943No. 98PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, District Judge.

The unbounded confidence of able counsel for plaintiffs in the right of plaintiffs to recover, exhibited in the trial of the case and expressed in the written brief for plaintiffs, impels the court to submit this memorandum.

The case was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury on October 5, 1943, and formal findings of fact and conclusions of law have this day been signed and filed.

The- pleadings, including motions, raise Onany questions, the decision of which are not necessary in view of the opinion of the court on the question of the right of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. SpinksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Turner v. Hot Springs Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  4. Martin v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  5. Mays v. Ritchie Grocer CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hutto v. BensonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1953
  2. Armstrong v. Commerce Tankers Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  3. Williams v. Oklahoma Tire & Supply Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API