Legal Opinion
Heekin Can Co. v. Kimbrough
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided August 17, 1961No. Civ. A. No. 1559PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN E. MILLER, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff, The Heekin Can Company, is a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Ohio and qualified to do business in the State of Arkansas.
The defendant, The Lawrence Warehouse Company, is a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California and qualified to do business in the State of Arkansas.
At all times material to the issues in this case, the plaintiff was engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling metal containers for the food canning industry, and regularly…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Union Trust Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Peter T. Ribaudo, Trustee of Visser Plumbing and Heating Co., Inc., Bankrupt v. Citizens National Bank of OrlandoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HempflingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Bradley v. St. Louis Terminal Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- Turner v. Hot Springs Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hoffman v. Herdman's Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- United States v. CarrollDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1962
- Douglas-Guardian Warehouse Corp. v. NickellDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1964