Blodgett v. Blodgett
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
William Blodgett contends that the court of appeals erred in refusing to dismiss Nancy Blodgett's appeal on the basis of her execution of the satisfaction of judgment. For the reasons that follow, we agree with this contention and hold that when Nancy executed the satisfaction of judgment she waived her right to continue her appeal.
It is a well-established principle of law that a satisfaction of judgment renders an appeal from that judgment moot. “ ‘Where the court rendering judgment has jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action and of the parties, and fraud has not intervened, and the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Fruhauf Southwest Garment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Hartsville Oil Mill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Urban Plumbing & Heating Co., an Oregon Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Lynch v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by139 opinions
- Lucarell v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Maust v. Bank One Columbus, N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Jones v. U-Haul Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- Blood v. NofzingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Demetrious Smith v. ABN AMRO Mortgage Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.