Legal Opinion

State v. Schilz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1971No. State 124PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The record indicates that the defendant at the time of trial was nineteen years old. He admitted that he had been convicted of juvenile crime and also that he had had more than one misdemeanor conviction as an adult. No request for a presentence in vestigation was made. Before sentencing, the trial judge stated:

“His answers were sarcastic to the district attorney and in this court’s opinion, he is a deliberate, bold-faced liar and will be treated as such by this court. His address tomorrow will be the Wisconsin Reformatory for Men.”

The trial judge then asked the defendant if he wished to say…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCleary v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Jung v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. TuttleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Price v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Cheney v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Rosado v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Bautista v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Ocanas v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. TewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. MacEmonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API