State v. Tuttle

Defendant contends (1) that the verdict was based on speculation or resulted from bias, and (2) that under the circumstances it was an abuse of discretion to fine him $150 and costs.

1. Sufficiency of evidence. Defendant did not, either before or after verdict, raise in the circuit court the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to go to the jury. In the absence of a motion to set aside the verdict on that ground, de fendant is not entitled to review here. In any event, the evidence amply sustains the verdict. The only testimony was given by the officer. He was in his patrol car on a…