Stampfli v. Stampfli
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The plaintiff was granted an interlocutory decree of divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty and the defendant appeals. The complaint alleges many specific acts of cruelty. The answer denies some of the alleged acts and pleads justification of those not denied. With his answer the defendant filed a cross-complaint charging the plaintiff with extreme cruelty and specifying several instances of improper conduct on her part with one Walter Stampfli, a cousin of the defendant, in support of said charges. 'The plaintiff answered the cross-complaint, denying the alleged improper conduct. Evidence…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Loveren v. LoverenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Holt Manufacturing Co. v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Krug v. F. A. Lux Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Lacey v. LaceyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Turner v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Polk v. PolkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- McKannay v. McKannayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Hall v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.