Legal Opinion

Bell v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction

Ohio Court of Claims

Decided May 5, 2004No. 2002-06391-ADPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Daniel R. Borchert, Deputy Clerk.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff, Christopher D. Bell, an inmate incarcerated at defendant’s Grafton Correctional Institution (“GCI”), stated that he repeatedly attempted to obtain a bottom-bunk assignment due to a medical disability. Plaintiff claimed that he suffers from a preexisting foot injury that prohibited him from walking long distances or standing for long periods of time. Additionally, plaintiff claimed that he cannot jump up and down without experiencing significant foot pain. Therefore, plaintiff asserted that he needed a bottom-bunk assignment and had been trying…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bruni v. TatsumiOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. BallewOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Clemets v. HestonOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Smith v. United Properties, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API