Legal Opinion

Smith v. United Properties, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1965No. Nos. 38780 and 38781PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHebbeRt, J.

Since these cases present the same question of law, they will be consolidated for the purposes of this opinion and will be referred to in the singular.

The question presented here may be stated in this language:

Does the rule of liability applicable to a municipality as provided in Section 723.01, Revised Code, apply also to the liability of an owner of a shopping center to its invitees?

The statutory law and the common law perform separate functions in the continuous development of our system of jurisprudence.

Section 723.01 of the Revised Code provides:

“Municipal corporations shall have special…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Englehardt v. PhilippsOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Blythe v. Vail, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1938

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Jeswald v. HuttOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Cash v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Parsons v. Lawson Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Markle v. WilliamsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Baldauf v. Kent State UniversityOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API