Legal Opinion
Eurodif S.A. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 21, 2007No. 2007-1005, 2007-1006PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, District Judge.
In this dispute about the correct application of the antidumping statute, 19 U.S.C. § 1673, to enriched uranium feedstock, appellants United States, USEC Inc., and United States Enrichment Corp. (the latter two collectively referred to as “USEC”) appeal from a judgment of the United States Court of International Trade. Eurodif S.A. v. United States, 442 F.Supp.2d 1367 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2006). In 2005, we issued two interlocutory opinions in the same case, Eurodif S.A. v. United States, 411 F.3d 1355 (Fed.Cir.2005) (“Eu rodif I”), and Eurodif S.A. v. United States, 423…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the InteriorSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Reno v. Catholic Social Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Electric Bond & Share Co. v. Securities & Exchange Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Eurodif S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012