Legal Opinion

Foley v. Morse & Mowbray

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1993No. 21901PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Facts

In January, 1971, the firm of Morse, Foley & Wadsworth was formed as a professional corporation, and Joseph M. Foley (Foley) signed an employment agreement requiring him to account to the corporation as his employer for all compensation that he received. Several years later, Jim Wadsworth left the firm, leaving Foley and William R. Morse (Morse) as fifty percent shareholders under the law firm name of Morse-Foley. At that time, the principal client of the firm was the Hughes Tool Company. Foley was the source of the Hughes business, having worked for a number of years on business…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Robert FLOWERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CROUCH-WALKER CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  3. In Re the Estate of LarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Golden Nugget, Inc. v. HamNevada Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dow Chemical Co. v. MahlumNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Semenza v. Caughlin Crafted HomesNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Nevada Power Co. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1995
  4. Kattawar v. Logistics & Distribution Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2015
  5. Dow Chemical Co. v. MahlumNevada Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API